Wed Apr 10, 2013 4:21 pm (PDT) . Posted by:
That is to say, frequency is equal to 1 divided by time. That closely resembles Bearden’
What does that mean? It would mean that frequency and time show the same reciprocal relationship that light and gravitics show. If Van Tassel was honest, they’re part of the same relationship. But how could that be? The nature and structure of time would only be a matter of how we define our observation of time. For example, if the 1 in that equation is a short distance, the equation can look at a mere radio wave. But if the 1 of the equation is the entire universe, it poses scalar frequencies that nearly instantly resonate across the entirety (in different gravitic shells, or parameters). If Van Tassel is correct, we’re swimming in a scalar sea of present and future time essentially resonating all around us.
That’s probably true, given what we know about scalars (gravitics). As Naval Surface Weapons physicist Eldon Byrd, PhD noted, scalars can resonate from any location to any vastly distant location nearly instantly. So, in remote sensing your mind’s scalars can resonate across vast distances nearly instantly. Consider the following: the mere 20-80 light year radius bubble of space that normal light information has expanded into during your lifetime can be criss-crossed nearly instantly, by scalars. In other words, scalars (gravitics) can greatly exceed or encompass and nearly instantly probe the space of your past (or a distant past that vastly exceeds your lifetime!) That’s because that light speed bubble of “space-
That’s easy to see. We know alien technology can do some of this, but forget about technology for now (to be slave to technology is to be slave to technology that gray alignment aliens barter for advantage here). Your mind can easily resonate across great distances and across the strange structuring of time therein, including the past (perhaps some of the future, also). You don’t need technology to do that.
Let’s see see how science would plug Van Tassel’s relationship into another of Bearden’
So, let’s see how Bearden and Van Tassel map onto each other (basic relationships, not just math).
E = ∆t c2
F = 1 / t
Like when you used to stack algebra equations to compare them, we see that energy and frequency are obviously related (“frequency&qu
Back up there at the end of Bearden’
Let’s paint a picture that a five year old could understand. To do scalars in the mind, once you’ve done the half-flip and half-spin of the energy field in the central parts of your brain (which converges energy from all directions, canceling it out), you then use the larger envelope of your brain to contour a small segment of a curve that, if extended far out into space, would curve far out and back around like a giant bubble that contains both the present and the past. The trick is to then pull on the larger universe while you do that and it instantly varies the larger universal envelope so that weirdly looped phase waves keep you connected to that (slightly fluctuating) past.
So, that’s it, in a nutshell. This is good for remotely sensing/viewing the past. An actual physical visit would be another subject (beyond me, if not dangerous, say some aliens). So called Haven aliens in Alec Newald’s book Coevolution said they experimented with time travel but it was dangerous because some of them got lost in the dislocation of causation. Older aliens called Verdants told Krapf they, themselves, can’t do time travel. Advanced aliens in my contacts have clearly, unmistakeably gone out of their way to refer to some minor future events that later occurred. I can see that they can easily resonate into that parameter, somehow (to view it, at least). However, like some of the Awake and Aware (time travel) panelists said a few days ago, we have to ACTIVELY achieve a good future, rather than assume it will merely happen.